Mattel plant might fall to
development
Kevin Harden -
One of the Mattel/Viewmaster plant
buildings could be demolished to make room for expansion of
JAIME
The old Mattel/Viewmaster plant on
Harsch Investment Properties Inc. of
Representatives of Harsch
Investments were scheduled to meet this week with city planners to discuss the
proposal that includes adding 87,000 square feet of new retail space to
CSCB Architects of Portland, which is designing the project,
submitted the proposal in mid-December. In addition to the new retail
buildings, the company expects to add 337 new parking spaces to the shopping
center’s 560-space lot.
There is no estimate of the project’s cost.
Harsch Investment Properties
representatives will discuss the proposal Jan. 15 with the Greenway
Neighborhood Association Committee. The company has not yet applied for a
permit to build the project. All discussions are in the preliminary stages
prior to development.
Company representative Mary Ann Kolen
said Harsch Investments was “exploring options” to
expand
Other company representatives declined to discuss the
proposed project.
Hall Street Associates of Seattle owns the Viewmaster plant site. It has been vacant since May 2001.
Harsch Investment Properties has
owned the shopping center for about five years. The
According to a preliminary site plan, construction of the
new
Nearly all of the old plant would have to be demolished
under the proposal. Part of one building would be preserved for parking near
the new storage facility.
Demolition of the Viewmaster plant
probably would not pose an environmental problem, even though the site’s
groundwater has been contaminated for decades with the solvent
trichloroethylene (TCE), said Bruce A. Gilles, project manager for the state
Department of Environmental Quality.
“We always envisioned the site being redeveloped at some
point,” Gilles said.
DEQ and Mattel have worked for several years to clean up the
TCE contaminated water under the site. The state and nine property owners,
including Harsch Investment Properties, reached an
agreement in October 2002 that created the $3.45 million, 30-year cleanup plan.
Under the plan, anyone who owns the plant site assumes the
responsibility for the cleanup. It also forbids the new owners from drilling a
new well or using the groundwater, something that isn’t likely in the new
development, Gilles said.
TCE, a colorless liquid used for decades to degrease
industrial equipment, seeped for years into the groundwater around the plant. Thousands
of employees who worked at the plant making Viewmaster
viewers — first for GAF then for Tyco and Mattel — drank water contaminated
with the solvent from 1952 until 1980.
Tests of the water supply near the site in March 1998 found
TCE levels hundreds of times higher than thought safe for humans.
Exposure to high concentrations of TCE can cause cancers and
other illnesses.
State health officials are working with former Viewmaster employees to study the effects of the exposure. Mattel,
which has owned the site since 1997, maintains a one-person office in Tigard to
provide information and limited medical testing for former plant employees.
Former Viewmaster employees also
have formed the group Victims of TCE Exposure, or VOTE, to press for more and
better medical treatment and testing. The group also has hinted at a possible
lawsuit against the plant’s owners because of the exposure.
Dan Nottage, general manager of
Mattel Portland, the last official employee of the plant, said he felt a
sentimental attachment to the buildings, but would rather see the area be redeveloped.
“This is probably the best thing for the landlord to do with
the site,” said Nottage, who worked at the Viewmaster plant from 1978 to 2001. “It’s not much good as
it is for most uses.
“Personally, I’d be happy to see it developed into something
that could be useful. I would miss it from a work history relationship. But
actually, I would be very happy to see it put to a more beneficial use.”
Harsch Investment Properties also
would not need DEQ permission to redevelop the property, he said. The company
would have to manage some petroleum contamination under one of the buildings,
but that could be accomplished without disrupting much of the project, Gilles
said.
“In circumstances like this, it’s not uncommon for the
parties redeveloping contaminated properties to talk with us about what to do,”
he said.