THE INFORMED PATIENT
By LAURA LANDRO
The Wall Street Journal
Hospitals Go 'Green'
To Cut Toxins, Improve
Patient Environment
Hospitals play a pivotal role in
protecting
Environmental health experts warn
that materials that cover floors, walls and ceilings release hundreds of
chemicals into hospital air, and chemicals used to clean and maintain hospitals
add more. Volatile organic compounds such as formaldehyde, acetaldehyde,
naphthalene and toluene are released into the air from particle board, carpets
and other finish materials and are inhaled by patients and staff. Polyvinyl
chloride (PVC), which releases the carcinogen dioxin during its manufacture, is
widely used in the production of IV and blood bags, plastic tubing and other
hospital products, as well as carpets.
In addition, inadequate ventilation
and generally high energy consumption have contributed to poor air quality and
pollution, studies show, with effects ranging from longer patient recovery
times to more sick days for staff.
Now, as the industry embarks on a
$200 billion construction program over the next decade to replace or rebuild
decaying facilities and meet growing demand from aging baby boomers, that is starting to change. Under pressure from local and state
governments, as well as health-care architects and designers and their own
environmentally conscious donors, hospitals are building more efficient,
eco-friendly facilities with "sustainable" design features that
conserve energy, use natural light and materials and reduce potentially
dangerous emissions.
Rooftop solar panels on Kaiser's
About a dozen pioneering groups,
including Kaiser Permanente and
When Kaiser Permanente's new medical
center in Modesto, Calif., is completed in 2008, solar panels will cut energy
costs, permeable pavement material will filter chemicals from rainwater runoff,
floors will be covered with natural rubber, carpets will be backed with
recycled safety glass -- even toilets will be fitted with special fixtures to
conserve water. The new center is part of a $20 billion-plus facilities program
at the Oakland, Calif.-based health-care giant that includes building or
replacing 27 hospitals over the next nine years.
To be sure, there is conflicting
evidence about the harm caused by chemicals in hospitals, and some
manufacturers say there is no direct evidence that PVC, for example, is harmful
to humans. But the nonprofit advocacy group Healthcare Without
Harm says hospitals have a responsibility to choose the safest course when
evidence suggests harmful effects. The group cites studies that show hazardous
additives in PVC are toxic to both the reproductive and neurological systems --
a particular concern for neonatal-intensive-care patients. The American
Hospital Association signed a memorandum of understanding with the Environmental
Protection Agency several years ago to phase out the use of mercury, which can
affect the human nervous system, in things like thermometers and blood-pressure
cuffs.
At the same time, studies show that
environmental improvements associated with sustainable buildings, such as
bringing in more natural daylight, meditation areas and "healing
gardens," can shorten patients' length of stay, reduce reliance on
medication, and lessen mental and physical stress.
As hospitals move to make such
changes, the challenge now is not only to build hospitals to rigid
environmental standards, but also to operate them with the same principles in
mind. "You can't build a green hospital and still have Styrofoam cups in
the cafeteria," says health-care architect Robin Guenther, a
co-coordinator of the Green Guide for Healthcare.
Stiffer federal regulations
governing emissions of chemicals and heavy metals like dioxin and mercury have
driven some changes, in particular regarding incinerators used to dispose of
medical waste. Since the mid 1990s, when regulators found that hospital
incinerators were a major contributor to mercury and dioxin emissions, more
than 5,000 medical-waste incinerators have closed, and hospitals have adopted
safer waste-disposal and treatment technologies.
"Hospitals didn't think of
themselves as polluters, with spewing smokestacks and waste going out the back
door," says Laura Brannen, executive director of the nonprofit Hospitals
for a Healthy Environment (h2e-online.org <http://www.h2e-online.org/> 2), which
helps hospitals devise improved environmental programs that also shave costs.
Among them: separating hazardous waste, infectious waste and solid waste, which
must be treated and disposed of differently, and recycling or reclaiming
chemicals for medical use.
But Ms. Brannen cautions that many
hospitals still send their waste to municipal incinerators that contribute to
health threats. Wastewater from hospitals, she adds, still contains toxic lab
and cleaning chemicals and pharmaceutical compounds, many of which aren't
broken down in sewage-treatment plants.
Hospitals are also scrambling to
find substitutes for building and interior finish materials. And companies that
supply the industry are under growing pressure to come up with green products,
including latex-free examination gloves, greener cleaners without harsh
chemicals and recyclable solvents.
"In an era of rising
construction costs, you don't have to pay extra money and use precious
health-care dollars just to be green," says Christine Malcolm, Kaiser
senior vice president of national facilities and hospitals. With the industry's
purchasing power, "we can force suppliers to generate environmentally
sensitive products."
Kaiser, for example, pressured
carpet manufacturers to come up with a PVC-free product, which it will use in
all its new facilities. Kaiser is also installing "dual-flush"
toilets, which use more water for flushing solid waste and less for liquid,
saving half a gallon of water for the latter. In the past five years the
company says it has eliminated the purchase and disposal of 40 tons of
hazardous chemicals, chosen "ecologically sustainable" materials for
30 million square feet in new construction, and saved more than $10 million a
year through energy-conservation strategies.
While many of the innovations cost
more up front, they can actually reduce operating costs over time, says Gary
Cohen, executive director of the Environmental Health Fund, a nonprofit group
that works on chemical-safety issues. Rubber flooring is more expensive to
install than PVC, for example, "but the hospital will save much more
during the lifetime of the flooring due to the fact that you don't need to
constantly strip the floor with toxic chemicals and rewax it," Mr. Cohen
says.
Still, going green can be
challenging for hospitals that have to rebuild or retrofit older facilities. To
build the new
"It may have cost us a few
dollars more, but in the long run it will pay dividends," says St. Mary's
President and Chief Executive Philip H. McCorkle Jr. Another incentive: A local
benefactor made a major gift to the hospital contingent on sustainable design.
The hospital also prepares food to order, which Mr. McCorkle says uses less
energy, wastes less food, and makes patients happier than the traditional
cafeteria model.
The University of
Pittsburgh Medical Center, which is building a new children's hospital due for
completion in 2009, is paying special attention to issues such as materials
used to cover and clean floors, since its small patients "are closer to
the floors and the source of chemicals," says President and CEO Roger
Oxendale. But the hospital is also teaching medical interns about environmental
health and reaching out to underserved populations to educate them about issues
such as how second-hand smoke can harm their children.